Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Skip to main content
Survey Practice
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Editor Notes
    • In-Brief Notes
    • Interview the Expert
    • Recent Books, Papers, and Presentations
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Subscribe
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:32151/feed
Articles
Vol. 9, Issue 5, 2016August 31, 2016 EDT

The relationship between linkage refusal and selected health conditions of survey respondents

Judith Weissman, Jennifer D Parker, Donna M Miller, Eric A Miller, Renee M Gindi,
national health interview surveyhealth surveyconsent biasrecord linkage
https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2016-0028
Survey Practice
Weissman, Judith, Jennifer D Parker, Donna M Miller, Eric A Miller, and Renee M Gindi. 2016. “The Relationship between Linkage Refusal and Selected Health Conditions of Survey Respondents.” Survey Practice 9 (5). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.29115/​SP-2016-0028.
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Abstract

To maximize limited resources and reduce respondent burden, there is an increased interest in linking population health surveys with other sources of data, such as administrative records. Health differences between adults who consent to and refuse linkage could bias study results with linked data. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data are routinely linked to administrative records from the Social Security Administration and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Using the NHIS 2010-2013, we examined the association between selected health conditions and respondents’ linkage refusal. Linkage refusal was significantly lower for adults with serious psychological distress, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, hypertension, and cancer compared to those without these conditions. Linkage refusal decreased as the number of conditions increased and health status decreased. Our finding that linkage consent was associated with respondents’ health characteristics suggests that researchers should try to address potential linkage bias in their analyses.

Background

Linking data collected in surveys with other sources of data, such as administrative data, can maximize limited resources and reduce respondent burden. Similar to nonresponse bias, differential linkage refusal increases the possibility of ‘consent’ or ‘linkage’ bias (Hill, Atkinson, and Blakely 2002; Jenkins et al. 2006; Sala, Burton, and Knies 2012). As for nonresponse bias (Groves 2006), linkage bias can lead to inaccurate estimates of population characteristics (Sakshaug and Kreuter 2012; Sakshaug et al. 2012). Previous studies have examined health differences between those who consent to link and those who do not. Some studies reported poorer health among those who consented, other studies found no systematic health differences by consent status, and some studies found differences by consent status that varied among health endpoints (Bohensky et al. 2010; Carter et al. 2010; Cruise et al. 2015; Dunn 2004; Huang et al. 2007; Kho et al. 2009; Knies, Burton, and Sala 2012; Knies and Burton 2014; Young, Dobson, and Byles 2001).

The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics, is a principal source of information on the health of the civilian noninstitutionalized U.S. population. The cross-sectional NHIS data are routinely linked to administrative records from the Social Security Administration and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to maximize the scientific value of the survey without increasing respondents’ reporting burden (Golden et al. 2015). Respondents’ refusal to provide a Social Security Number (SSN) or Medicare Health Insurance Claim Number (HICNUM), used to facilitate linkage, may affect the composition of the linked sample. Our objective was to examine the role of health status on the propensity to refuse linkage in a large nationally representative U.S. sample. We estimated associations of health conditions, general health status, and the total number of health conditions with linkage refusal.

Methods

Data Source

Data came from the 2010–2013 NHIS. Details about the sampling frame and sample design have been published previously (Parsons et al. 2014). Interviews were conducted in respondents’ homes, with some telephone follow-ups. One person from each family answered questions about family members’ age, health insurance coverage, and general health status. One randomly selected “sample adult” aged 18 years and older from each family answered questions about himself or herself. In each year, the final response rate among sample adults was over 60 percent and data were obtained from approximately 30,000 sample adults. Details of the sample sizes and response rates are available in the survey documentation for each relevant year (e.g. NCHS 2013).

Linkage and Linkage Refusal

At the conclusion of the sample adult interview, respondents were asked: “To help us link your survey data with vital statistics and health-related records of other government agencies, we would like the last four digits of your Social Security Number. The National Center for Health Statistics uses this information for research purposes only. Providing this information is voluntary. Federal laws authorize us to ask for this information and require us to keep it strictly private. There will be no effect on your benefits if you do not provide this information. What are the last four digits of your Social Security Number?” Respondents were similarly asked for the last four digits of the HICNUM if they were Medicare eligible. Respondents who answered “no,” “refused,” “don’t know,” or “don’t have a SSN (or Medicare number),” were asked: “May we try to link your survey data without [your SSN/HICNUM]?”

The questions were the same whether administered in-person or by telephone. For the analysis, record-linkage consent was defined as permission to use the SSN or HICNUM to link, or permission to link without either an SSN or HICNUM. Record-linkage refusal was defined as refusal to provide either the SSN or HICNUM combined with refusal to allow linkage without the SSN or HICNUM. For the 2010–2013 NHIS, unweighted linkage refusal ranged from 10.0 percent in 2010 to 11.8 percent in 2013.

Health Characteristics

The selected health conditions examined were hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), serious psychological distress (SPD), and stroke. Hypertension was defined as having been told by a doctor or other health professional of having hypertension on two or more different visits. Heart disease was based on responses to questions about having ever been told by a doctor or other health professional of having coronary heart disease, angina (angina pectoris), a heart attack (myocardial infarction) or any heart disease or condition. Diabetes (excluding borderline diabetes) and stroke were also based on “yes” or “no” responses to questions about having ever been told by a doctor or other health professional of having these conditions. Cancer was based on responses to having ever been told by a doctor or other health professional of having cancer or a malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer. COPD was based on positive responses to questions about having ever been told by a doctor or other health professional of having emphysema or having been told in the past 12 months of having had chronic bronchitis (American Thoracic Society 2004). SPD was measured using the K6, a series of six psychological distress questions asking how often a respondent experienced symptoms of psychological distress during the past 30 days (Kessler et al. 2003). Small numbers of respondents were missing data: hypertension (n=253); heart disease (n=54); diabetes (n=91); cancer (n=106); COPD (n=44); SPD (n=2,025); stroke (n=121) respondent-assessed health status (n=66); and total number of conditions (n=2,534). Records with missing data were not included in the health-outcome specific analyses but were retained in the overall study population.

Demographic Characteristics

Demographic characteristics included race and ethnicity, age, and poverty. Race and ethnicity were categorized as Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black and all other races/ethnicities. Age groups included 18–44 years, 45–64 years, and 65 years and over. Annual family income was categorized into a poverty index ratio (PIR) of below 100 percent of the federal poverty level, 100 percent–199 percent of the federal poverty level, 200 percent–399 percent of the federal poverty level, and 400 percent or more of the federal poverty level. Imputation was used to assign a poverty level for records with missing income data (Schenker et al. 2009). Because Miller et al. found a possible association with imputation status and record-linkage refusal (Miller, Gindi, and Parker 2011), imputation status was included as an independent variable, with categorical responses: providing all income information, providing income by categories, and providing no income information.

Statistical Analysis

Point estimates, corresponding variances, and 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated using SAS callable SUDAAN software (SUDAAN 2008) to provide weighted estimates and account for the complex sample design. Overall associations for categorical variables were evaluated using the Rao Scott Chi Square statistic for weighted survey data.

We used multivariable logistic regression models that included one health condition or characteristic and controlled for age group, sex, race/ethnicity, PIR, and income imputation status. Trend tests identified linear relationships between linkage refusal, health status, and total number of health conditions.

Results

The study population included 129,253 adults with complete demographic data. Approximately 11 percent of respondents refused record linkage. Close to 50 percent were aged less than 45 years (sample mean age was 47 years) and almost 70 percent were non-Hispanic White (Table 1). The majority of adults were in the 200–399 percent PIR (30 percent) and ≥400 percent PIR (37 percent) groups. Nearly 39 percent of adults had at least one health condition.

Table 1  Percent distribution of demographic and health characteristics and percent refusing linkage among adults aged 18 years and over; NHIS, 2010–2013.
Sample Size unweighted
Percent distribution
Refused linkage
p-Value
No. Weighted % 95% CI Weighted % 95% CI
Overall 129,253 100 10.7 10.3, 11.0
Sex
 Male 57,510 48.3 47.9, 48.6 10.4 10.0, 10.9 0.04
 Female 71,743 51.7 51.4, 52.1 10.9 10.5, 11.3
Age group (years)
 18–44 58,170 47.6 47.1, 48.1 9.9 9.5, 10.3 <0.01c
 45–64 43,617 34.9 34.5, 35.3 11.1 10.6, 11.6
 65 and over 27,466 17.5 17.2, 17.9 12.0 11.4, 12.6
Race/ethnicity
 Hispanic 22,827 14.5 14.0, 15.0 13.4 12.8, 14.1 <0.01
 Non-Hispanic White 76,944 67.7 67.0, 68.3 10.0 9.6, 10.4
 Non-Hispanic Black 20,129 11.9 11.5, 12.4 9.9 9.2, 10.6
 All other races and ethnicities 9,353 5.9 5.6, 6.2 13.0 12.0, 14.1
Poverty index ratioa
 Less than 100% 23,458 13.7 13.3, 14.2 9.9 9.3, 10.5 <0.01c
 100–199% 27,519 19.2 18.8, 19.6 10.6 10.0, 11.2
 200–399% 37,790 30.2 29.7, 30.6 10.8 10.2, 11.3
 400% or more 40,486 37.0 36.2, 37.7 10.9 10.5, 11.4
Income imputation status
 Provided income 106,645 81.2 80.8, 81.6 8.6 8.2, 8.9 <0.01
 Income reported in categories 17,873 15.0 14.7, 15.3 17.5 16.7, 18.4
 Did not provide income 4,735 3.8 3.6, 4.0 29.0 27.3, 30.8
Serious psychological distressb
 Yes 4,862 3.4 3.3, 3.5 7.1 6.2, 8.1 <0.01
 No 122,366 96.6 96.5, 96.8 10.8 10.4, 11.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseb
 Yes 7,130 5.1 5.0, 5.3 7.9 7.1, 8.9 <0.01
 No 121,973 94.9 94.7, 95.0 10.8 10.4, 11.2
Diabetesb
 Yes 13,131 9.1 8.9, 9.3 9.0 8.3, 9.7 <0.01
 No 116,031 90.9 90.7, 91.1 10.8 10.5, 11.2
Heart diseaseb
 Yes 16,031 11.5 11.3, 11.7 9.0 8.4, 9.7 <0.01
 No 113,022 88.5 88.3, 88.7 10.9 10.5, 11.2
Strokeb
 Yes 4,081 2.7 2.6, 2.8 8.3 7.3, 9.5 <0.01
 No 125,051 97.3 97.2, 97.4 10.7 10.4, 11.1
Hypertensionb
 Yes 36,271 25.6 25.2, 26.0 9.5 9.1, 10.0 <0.01
 No 92,729 74.4 74.0, 74.8 11.0 10.7, 11.4
Cancerb
 Yes 8,340 5.9 5.9, 6.3 9.6 8.8, 10.5 <0.01
 No 120,807 94.1 93.7, 94.1 10.7 10.4, 11.1
Respondent-reported healthb
 Excellent 33,648 28.3 27.9, 28.7 11.2 10.6, 11.7 <0.01c
 Very good 40,238 32.0 31.7, 32.4 10.5 10.1, 11.0
 Good 35,570 26.6 26.2, 26.9 10.8 10.3, 11.4
 Fair 15,003 9.9 9.7, 10.2 9.9 9.3, 10.6
 Poor 4,728 3.2 3.1, 3.3 8.6 7.6, 9.7
Total number of health conditionsb
 0 74,397 61.4 61.0, 61.9 11.3 10.9, 11.8 <0.01c
 1 29,236 22.4 22.2, 22.7 10.0 9.5, 10.5
 2 or more 23,086 16.2 15.9, 16.5 8.7 8.2, 9.3  

CI, confidence interval.

aPIR is defined as ratio of family income to a federal poverty standard.

bUnweighted sample sizes for health outcomes do not sum to the total due to missing data.

cp-Value for test of trend.

In bivariate analysis, Hispanic adults were the most likely to refuse record-linkage (13 percent) compared to non-Hispanic White (10 percent) and non-Hispanic Black (10 percent) adults (Table 1). Adults in the youngest age group were less likely to refuse linkage than other age groups. Adults in the lowest income groups were less likely to refuse linkage than those in higher income groups (p for trend < 0.01). Adults who did not provide income information were more likely to refuse linkage (29 percent) than adults who reported their income (9 percent). Adults with any one health condition were less likely to refuse linkage than adults without the condition.

In separate multivariable logistic regression models, each of the health conditions remained inversely associated with linkage refusal after controlling for age, race/ethnicity, sex, PIR, and income imputation status (Table 2). In addition, the inverse association was stronger as number of conditions increased (p for trend <0.01; Table 2). Similarly, those with better general health status had higher rates of linkage refusal (p for trend <0.01). Sensitivity analyses that excluded the income imputation variable (an indicator of refusal to provide income information) and included the survey year (to allow for changes in record-linkage refusal over time) had similar results to the main findings.

Table 2  Associations between health characteristics and record-linkage refusal from multivariable logistic models: NHIS 2010–2013.
Health characteristic included separately in adjusted modelsa Adjusted odds ratiob 95 percent confidence interval
Serious psychological distress 0.69 0.60, 0.79
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 0.73 0.65, 0.83
Diabetes 0.75 0.69, 0.82
Heart disease 0.79 0.73, 0.85
Stroke 0.71 0.61, 0.82
Hypertension 0.79 0.74, 0.83
Cancer 0.84 0.76, 0.93
Respondent-assessed health status
 Excellent Reference
 Very good 0.94 0.88, 1.00
 Good 0.93 0.87, 0.99
 Fair 0.83 0.76, 0.90
 Poor 0.72 0.63, 0.83
Total number of health conditions
 0 Reference
 1 0.80 0.75, 0.85
 2 or more 0.65 0.61, 0.71

aThe reference level for a health condition was the absence of a self-reported diagnosis for that health condition.

bRecord-linkage refusal was the binary outcome. Independent variables included age, race/ethnicity, sex, poverty index ratio (PIR), and income imputation status. Chronic health conditions, health group, or total number of chronic health conditions were included as independent variables in separate models.

Discussion

Our major finding was that adults with hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, COPD, SPD, or stroke were less likely to refuse linkage compared to adults without one of these health conditions. The finding was further supported by a dose-response association between linkage refusal and number of health conditions and health status. As the number of health conditions increased, adults were less likely to refuse record-linkage. Similarly, refusal to link decreased with poorer reported health status.

The results are consistent with other studies showing associations between health and linkage refusal (Dunn 2004; Knies, Burton, and Sala 2012; Knies and Burton 2014; Young, Dobson, and Byles 2001). Differences in linkage refusal by health characteristics may be explained by leverage-salience theory; faced with a survey request of interest, respondents cooperate at higher rates than those less interested (Groves, Singer, and Corning 2000).

Health differences between adults who consent and refuse linkage could bias study results. Weighting methods to decrease linkage bias, similar to survey nonresponse bias, have been proposed for analyses of NCHS linked data (Judson, Parker, and Larsen 2013). However, weighting methods may not fully account for potential biases. The best approach may depend on the study question. It is possible to obtain information for a large number of health factors to inform approaches for analyses using the linked data.

Our report on record-linkage refusal in a national sample found that respondents without selected health conditions were more likely to refuse linkage. Researchers should evaluate potential biases in their analyses due to linkage refusal to determine appropriate adjustment.

References

American Thoracic Society. 2004. Standards for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with COPD. New York, NY: American Thoracic Society.
Google Scholar
Bohensky, Megan A, Damien Jolley, Vijaya Sundararajan, Sue Evans, David V Pilcher, Ian Scott, and Caroline A Brand. 2010. “Data Linkage: A Powerful Research Tool with Potential Problems.” BMC Health Services Research 10 (1). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1186/​1472-6963-10-346.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Carter, K., C. Shaw, M. Hayward, and T. Blakely. 2010. “Understanding the Determinants of Consent for Linkage of Administrative Health Data with a Longitudinal Survey.” Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 5 (2): 53–60.
Google Scholar
Cruise, Sharon Mary, Lynsey Patterson, Chris R. Cardwell, and Dermot O’Reilly. 2015. “Large Panel-Survey Data Demonstrated Country-Level and Ethnic Minority Variation in Consent for Health Record Linkage.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 68 (6): 684–92. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jclinepi.2015.01.011.
Google Scholar
Dunn, K.M. 2004. “Patterns of Consent in Epidemiologic Research: Evidence from Over 25,000 Responders.” American Journal of Epidemiology 159 (11): 1087–94. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1093/​aje/​kwh141.
Google Scholar
Golden, C., A.K. Driscoll, A.E. Simon, D.H. Judson, E.A. Miller, and J.D. Parker. 2015. “Linkage of NCHS Population Health Surveys to Administrative Records from Social Security Administration and Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services.” Vital and Health Statistics 1 (58): 1–53.
Google Scholar
Groves, R.M. 2006. “Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (5): 646–75.
Google Scholar
Groves, R.M., E. Singer, and A. Corning. 2000. “Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey Participation: Description and an Illustration.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (3): 299–308.
Google Scholar
Hill, S., J. Atkinson, and T. Blakely. 2002. “Anonymous Record Linkage of Census and Mortality Records: 1981, 1986, 1991, 1996 Census Cohorts.” In Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences. Wellington, New Zealand: University of Otago.
Google Scholar
Huang, Nicole, Shu-Fang Shih, Hsing-Yi Chang, and Yiing-Jenq Chou. 2007. “Record Linkage Research and Informed Consent: Who Consents?” BMC Health Services Research 7 (February):18. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1186/​1472-6963-7-18.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Jenkins, S.P., L. Cappellari, P. Lynn, A. Jäckle, and E. Sala. 2006. “Patterns of Consent: Evidence from a General Household Survey.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 169 (4): 701–22.
Google Scholar
Judson, D.H., J.D. Parker, and M.D. Larsen. 2013. “Adjusting Sample Weights for Linkage-Eligibility Using SUDAAN. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville Maryland.” 2013. https:/​/​www.cdc.gov/​nchs/​data/​datalinkage/​adjusting_sample_weights_for_linkage_eligibility_using_sudaan.pdf.
Kessler, R.C., P.R. Barker, L.J. Colpe, J.F. Epstein, J.C. Gfroerer, E. Hiripi, M.J. Howes, et al. 2003. “Screening for Serious Mental Illness in the General Population.” Archives of General Psychiatry 60 (2): 184–89.
Google Scholar
Kho, M.E., M. Duffett, D.J. Willison, D.J. Cook, and M.C. Brouwers. 2009. “Written Informed Consent and Selection Bias in Observational Studies Using Medical Records: Systematic Review.” British Medical Journal 338:b866.
Google Scholar
Knies, Gundi, and Jonathan Burton. 2014. “Analysis of Four Studies in a Comparative Framework Reveals: Health Linkage Consent Rates on British Cohort Studies Higher than on UK Household Panel Surveys.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 14 (1). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1186/​1471-2288-14-125.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Knies, Gundi, Jonathan Burton, and Emanuela Sala. 2012. “Consenting to Health Record Linkage: Evidence from a Multi-Purpose Longitudinal Survey of a General Population.” BMC Health Services Research 12 (1). https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1186/​1472-6963-12-52.
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
Miller, D., R. Gindi, and J. Parker. 2011. “Trends in Record Linkage Refusal Rates: Characteristics of National Health Interview Survey Participants Who Refuse Record Linkage.” In Paper Presented at the JSM Proceedings, Government Statistics Section. Miami Beach, Florida.
Google Scholar
NCHS. 2013. “National Health Interview Survey, 2013. Public-Use Data File and Documentation.” National Center for Health Statistics. 2013. https:/​/​www.cdc.gov/​nchs/​nhis/​quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm.
Parsons, V.L., C. Moriarity, K. Jonas, T.F. Moore, K.E. Davis, and L. Tompkins. 2014. “Design and Estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 2006–2015.” National Center for Health Statistics. Vital and Health Statistics 2 (165): 1–53.
Google Scholar
Sakshaug, J.W., M.P. Couper, M.B. Ofstedal, and D.R. Weir. 2012. “Linking Survey and Administrative Records Mechanisms of Consent.” Sociological Methods & Research 41 (4): 535–69.
Google Scholar
Sakshaug, J.W., and F. Kreuter. 2012. “Assessing the Magnitude of Non-Consent Biases in Linked Survey and Administrative Data.” Survey Research Methods 6 (2): 113–22.
Google Scholar
Sala, E., J. Burton, and G. Knies. 2012. “Correlates of Obtaining Informed Consent to Data Linkage Respondent, Interview, and Interviewer Characteristics.” Sociological Methods & Research 41 (3): 414–39.
Google Scholar
Schenker, N., T.E. Raghunathan, P. Chiu, D.M. Makuc, and A.J. Cohen. 2009. “Multiple Imputation of Family Income and Personal Earnings in the National Health Interview Survey: Methods and Examples.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 101:924–33.
Google Scholar
Young, A.F., A.J. Dobson, and J.E. Byles. 2001. “Health Services Research Using Linked Records: Who Consents and What Is the Gain?” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 25 (5): 417–20.
Google Scholar

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system