| Mobility plan: Zurich University Hospital |
Visitors to the hospital |
1615 |
57.00 |
|
25.88 |
|
| National SP survey on railway services |
Residents of French and German speaking Switzerland |
1561 |
84.00 |
|
|
67.71 |
| Regional mode and route choice SP |
Residents of the Canton Zurich |
1229 |
84.00 |
|
|
70.87 |
| National SP on value of travel time savings |
Swiss residents |
2317 |
152.90 |
|
|
52.74 |
| Fuel price and rail usage |
Residents of French and German speaking Switzerland |
1036 |
170.00 |
|
|
58.31 |
| Regional SR on value of statistical life |
Residents of Canton Ticino |
500 |
197.00 |
41.00 |
|
|
| Mobility plan: University of Zurich |
Employees of the university |
372 |
219.00 |
|
19.83 |
|
| Regional SR on value of statistical life |
Residents of German speaking Switzerland |
2000 |
223.60 |
|
33.91 |
|
| Home ownership and use of local facilities |
Residents in a quota sample of municipalities in the Zurich region |
9330 |
230.70 |
|
36.08 |
|
| National SP on the impacts of road pricing |
Residents of French and German speaking Switzerland |
2249 |
264.79 |
|
|
46.69 |
| Modelling mountaineers’ travel behaviour |
Members of the Swiss Alpine Club |
530 |
276.00 |
|
46.04 |
|
| Mobility biographies and regular travel |
Residents of Basel, Bern and Zurich |
3500 |
521.00 |
|
8.36 |
|
| Mobility biographies |
Residents of Canton Zurich |
1763 + 1537 |
529.00 |
30.90 |
14.70 |
|
|
| Mobility biographies and home ownership |
Residents of Canton Zurich |
300 |
655.40 |
|
19.87 |
|
| Social networks and mobility biographies |
Residents of Zurich |
4350 |
991.75 |
11.25 |
4.35 |
|
| Ego-centric social networks |
Residents of Canton Zurich |
761 + 91 |
900.00 |
|
17.35 |
36.88 |
Sources (in the order listed): Axhausen et al. (2006); Axhausen et al. (2007); Beige (2004); Beige and Axhausen (2005) (main study and pre-test) (also Beige, 2006); Jäggle (2006); Kowald et al. (2009) (Note that the study by Kowald et al. (2009); Locatelli (2004); Schiffmann (2005); Stäubli (2009); Vrtic and Axhausen (2004); Vrtic and Fröhlich (2006); Vrtic et al. (2007); Waldner et al. (2005); Weis et al. (2008); Weis and Axhausen (2009) involved a monetary incentive, phone contact with the interviewers and a personal post card from a member of the social network to which the respondents belong, inviting them to participate in the survey.) |